Salman Khan's hit-and-run case: Court rejects activist's plea

A sessions court today rejected the plea of a social activist seeking to intervene in the 2002 hit-and-run case allegedly involving actor Salman Khan to help the prosecution in the trial.

Judge S D Deshpande ruled that only an aggrieved party, complainant or witness had a right to intervene. In this case, the applicant, Santosh Daundkar, was neither a witness, complainant nor an aggrieved party. Hence, he could not be allowed to intervene, the court said.

Salman Khan: Hit-and-run Case

The court also rejected Daundkar's another plea seeking transfer of his complaint from magistrate court to sessions court about perjury action against Salman and police for allegedly producing wrong witnesses in this case, as a result of which the trial was delayed. The judge held that he had no jurisdiction to transfer the complaint. He asked the applicant to approach a higher court or the Principal Judge of Sessions Court in this regard.





On Salman's plea for a direction to media to report true and fair proceedings of the 2002 hit-and-run case, the court deferred its order till October 15 saying the Bombay High Court was seized of this matter. The court said that Salman had already moved the High Court by filing a defamation and civil suit against some media channels for allegedly not correctly reporting the proceedings of the case. As the matter was pending in High Court, the sessions court did not give any ruling on the actor's plea.

The judge observed the high court had already given an interim ruling that the media should provide a fair and objective reporting in the case involving the film star.

Salman's lawyer Shrikant Shivade argued that the media was biased against the actor and was not reporting correctly the court proceedings. This had tarnished the image of Salman in the eyes of public, he alleged and urged the media be directed to report true and fair proceedings in the case. On October 15, the court would hear Salman's lawyer and prosecution on whether the trial should begin afresh or evidence adduced earlier by the Magistrate should be considered by the sessions court.

Daundkar's lawyers Aditya Pratap and Abha Singh argued that their client wanted to intervene in this case in public interest to help the prosecution. They said section 301(1) of CrPc allowed Daundkar to intervene in the matter to help the prosecution. The lawyers cited three Supreme Court judgements to support their arguments. On the other hand, Salman's lawyer argued that Daundkar was a third party and could not intervene in the case. He cited nine judgements to argue his case. The prosecutor said he had no objection if Daundkar and his lawyers helped the prosecution. However, they had no right to examine the witnesses, he said.

The court, however, rejected Daundkar's plea saying that he was not an aggrieved party and was not concerned with the case. Hence, he had no right to intervene at this stage. But after the evidence is recorded, he may at the end of the trial urge the court to allow him intervene. As regards Daundkar's plea for perjury action against Salman and police, his lawyers said that the Magistrate's court at Bandra was inquiring into the matter. The lawyers argued that the inquiry should now be conducted by the sessions court because the hit-and-run case has been transferred from Magistrate's court to sessions court after it was held that the charge of culpable homicide was made out against the actor. 

The court rejected this plea also as the judge held that he was not empowered to decide this.

SOURCE: DNA INDIA

Salman Khan goes Bombay High Court looking for quashing of disregard case

Actor Salman Khan has registered a situation in the Bombay High court looking for quashing of a issue registered against him in a magistrate's court looking for disregard activity for publishing court purchases in situations against him on his web page.

Salman Khan

Salman's situation, in which he asked for forgiveness that he had designed the web page only to make sure that there was no wrong confirming by the press, is predicted to come up for listening to on Thursday before Rights KU Chandiwal.

A justice of the peace at Bandra court here had released brings to the acting professional on This summer 10 this season following a issue registered by capitalist Hemant Patil claiming disregard of court activity against Salman for supposedly publishing court process on his web page — www.salmankhanfiles.com.

The issue claimed that Salman was involved in situations such as the 2002 hit-and-run situation such as him and said that by publishing court issues on the web page, the acting professional had dedicated disregard of court as the issues were subjudice.

Salman, however, asked for forgiveness in his situation that he had designed a web page only to make sure that there was no wrong confirming by the press and that the web page provided actual details about his situations and nothing beyond that. He further said that no disregard had been dedicated by him.

The acting professional asked for forgiveness that the issue and the brings released to him may be quashed and set aside. He said the justice of the peace had not used his thoughts on the issue registered against him as he did not reach a prima facie summary that a situation of disregard of court had been created out.

8AWPT6T63PYX 

Hit-and-run case: Expenses created, Salman Khan pleads not guilty

Actor Salman Khan was on Wednesday billed with responsible killing not amounting to killing in the 2002 hit-and-run situation for which he can experience a prison phrase up to 10 years, Periods Now revealed.

On his part, Salman Khan asked for forgiveness not accountable.

Salman Khan was free from individual overall look in the situation.

If discovered accountable under the cost, Salman Khan could experience 10 years in prison.

Earlier, Salman Khan had been tried by a urban justice of the peace under the less serious charges of allergy and irresponsible generating, which predetermined a highest possible phrase of two years in prison.

However, the urban justice of the peace, after analyzing 17 witnesses in the situation, had invoked the more serious cost of responsible killing not amounting to killing against the acting professional.

On This July 19, the judge had adjourned listening to the issue until This July 24.

During the last listening to, Salman Khan was seated in the guests' place, but was called to take a position in the box intended for billed.

One individual was murdered and four others were harmed when a Area Cruiser motorcycle supposedly motivated by Salman Khan in an drunk condition ran over a number of footpath residents in Mumbai's Bandra suburban place in the beginning time of Sept 28, 2002.

Hit-and-run case: Expenses to be created against Salman Khan on This July 24

Actor Salman Khan was these days instructed by a Mumbai classes assess to appear before it on this July 24 for creating of expenses, establishing the level for begin of a clean test for responsible killing in the 2002 hit-and-run situation for which he can experience a prison phrase up to 10 years.

Sessions assess U B Hejib had on July 24 upheld a urban court's purchase that the offence of responsible killing not amounting to killing was created out against the 47-year-old Bollywood celebrity, ignored his attraction against the judgment, and requested him to appear before the assess these days.

The acting professional had previously been tried by a urban justice of the peace for a smaller offence of resulting in loss of life by carelessness (Section 304 A of IPC), which provides for a highest possible phrase of 2 years. He will now take a position test under a law associated with responsible killing that could entice a prison phrase up to 10 years.

Attired in a red clothing and couple of denims, the acting professional showed up before the classes assess who requested him to sit in the docking station. Salman sat alone on a bench, while his sis Arpita was standing beside him outside the docking station. His other sis, Alvira, was also existing in the courtroom along with his individual security guard.

The test in the classes assess would begin anew as the Bandra urban assess had stopped the process halfway after analyzing 17 witnesses, judgment that the more serious cost of responsible killing was created out against the acting professional. An offence under the cost of responsible killing is triable by a classes assess.

Salman was sometimes seen dozing off as Arpita prodded him to keep him conscious.

Outside the assess there was a fuss as injured parties and supporters were avoided by cops from coming into the space. On one event, the assess requested his team to go out and tell the individuals collected there not to create disturbance.

In a relevant growth, the assess arranged until This July 24 his purchase on two applications-- one shifted by capitalist Santosh Daundkar, looking for to get involved in the test, and another by the actor's advice for discipline the press from maligning the acting professional.

Salman Khan to deal with test for responsible killing in hit-and-run case

Bollywood acting professional Salman Khan is in a Mumbai period judge to deal with test for responsible eliminating not amounting to eliminating and not loss of life by carelessness in the 2002 Mumbai hit-and run-case.

One person was murdered and four were harmed in the incident.

Salman will be tried under Area 304 (ii) of the IPC in Mumbai classes judge from friday. And if charged, he encounters up to 10 years in prison.

The acting professional was previously tried for a smaller offence under Area 304-A of the IPC, with a highest possible penalties of two years in prison.

A Bandra urban judge, which was listening to the situation since 2006, lately moved it to a classes judge.

Salman had become a huge hit against the transaction but the request was refused.

Public District attorney Shankar Erande, opposite the attraction, said the justice of the peace had appropriately invoked expenses of responsible eliminating. He suggested that a cops security guard (now deceased) was associated with the acting professional in the automobile at the time of the incident and had cautioned him not to generate rashly. But the acting professional did not pay attention, Erande suggested.

The prosecutor posted Khan was intoxicated and realized his act of allergy generating, particularly after beverages, might outcome in loss of life of individuals in incident.

He also said the acting professional was completely conscious that individuals rested on the footpaths in the area.

On Sept 28, 2002, a Area Cruiser motorcycle which Salman was supposedly generating in an intoxicated condition rammed into a bakery in Bandra, eliminating one and hurting four others resting on the sidewalk.